Ashok Kumar vs State — 261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,118(1). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005222026

Case disposed

Filing Number

488/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

TIRWA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,118(1)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)द

Petitioner(s)

Ashok Kumar

Adv. Siyaram Kanaujia

Annu

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Special Judge SC/St Act

12-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Bail petition is allowed

Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case