Ashok Kumar vs State — 261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,118(1). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005222026

Filing Number

488/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

TIRWA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,118(1)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)द

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Kumar

    Adv. Siyaram Kanaujia

  2. 2.Annu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC/St Act

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case