Ashok Kumar vs State — 261/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,118(1). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPKJ010005222026
Filing Number
488/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
261/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Special Judge SC/St Act
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
TIRWA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Kumar
Adv. Siyaram Kanaujia
Annu
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Judge SC/St Act
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 261/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj, granted bail to the accused Ashok Kumar, Shiv Shankar, and Annu Patel. The accused were ordered to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of equal amount to secure their release. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 352 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the victim with abusive language and weapons, the charge sheet had not been filed, no prior criminal history existed, medical injuries were minor, and the case stemmed from an underlying land dispute. These factors warranted bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts