Saurabh urph Vimlesh vs State — 263/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005212026

Filing Number

487/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

263/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

INDERGARH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352

Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(d)

Petitioner(s)

1.Saurabh urph Vimlesh

Adv. Prashant Kumar Tiwari
2.Maneesh urph Bhura

Respondent(s)

1.State

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
20-Mar-2026

Bail petition is allowedView PDF

The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Kannauj granted bail to accused Saurabh and Manish on March 20, 2026, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges under IPC Sections 115(2) and 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d). The court noted that the injuries sustained by the complainant were minor in nature, there was no criminal history of the accused, and the co-accused had already been granted bail, making the bail application worthy of acceptance with personal bonds of ₹25,000 each and one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Disposed

Special Judge SC/St Act
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 263/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Kannauj granted bail to accused Saurabh and Manish on March 20, 2026, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges under IPC Sections 115(2) and 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d). The court noted that the injuries sustained by the complainant were minor in nature, there was no criminal history of the accused, and the co-accused had already been granted bail, making the bail application worthy of acceptance with personal bonds of ₹25,000 each and one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.