Pankaj vs State — 262/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2),324(4). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005092026

Filing Number

475/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

262/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

170

Police Station

TIRWA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2),324(4)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pankaj

    Adv. Rakesh kumar Tiwari

  2. 2.Ravi prakash

  3. 3.Rajeev Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Case 262/2026 Summary The court granted bail to the three accused petitioners—Pankaj, Rajiv Kumar, and Ravi Prakash—charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2), 324(4), 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting a complainant, damaging his tractor, and using caste-based slurs. The court found the bail application meritorious, noting the case is less than seven years imprisonment-liable, no medical evidence was attached, and considering the gravity and nature of the offense, the accused were entitled to bail upon furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC/St Act

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 262/2026 Summary The court granted bail to the three accused petitioners—Pankaj, Rajiv Kumar, and Ravi Prakash—charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2), 324(4), 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting a complainant, damaging his tractor, and using caste-based slurs. The court found the bail application meritorious, noting the case is less than seven years imprisonment-liable, no medical evidence was attached, and considering the gravity and nature of the offense, the accused were entitled to bail upon furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case