Vikas vs State — 233/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPKJ010004862026
Filing Number
455/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Special Judge SC/St Act
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vikas
Adv. Anil Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Bail Petition is rejectedView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh rejected the bail application of Vikas, accused under the UP Gangster Act (FIR 547/2025). The court found reasonable grounds to believe Vikas is an active gang member involved in organized theft/burglary for economic gain with co-accused, and determined he poses a flight risk and danger to witnesses, failing to satisfy the stringent bail conditions mandated under Section 19(4) of the Gangster Act, 1986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh rejected the bail application of Vikas, accused under the UP Gangster Act (FIR 547/2025). The court found reasonable grounds to believe Vikas is an active gang member involved in organized theft/burglary for economic gain with co-accused, and determined he poses a flight risk and danger to witnesses, failing to satisfy the stringent bail conditions mandated under Section 19(4) of the Gangster Act, 1986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts