Ghanshyam Others vs State — 216/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,323,506. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010004372026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

216/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

THATHIA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395,323,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ghanshyam Others

    Adv. Sambhu Dayal Saxena

  2. 2.Sanju Urf Ritesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Summary The court granted conditional bail to accused Ghanshyam and Sanjū (alias Ritesh Kumar) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 395 (dacoity), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found no prior criminal history, no misuse of interim bail, and noted that witnesses were family members of the complainant with no independent witnesses presented. Each accused was ordered to furnish bail bonds of ₹50,000 with personal bonds and undertakings to appear in court, cooperate with proceedings, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted conditional bail to accused Ghanshyam and Sanjū (alias Ritesh Kumar) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 395 (dacoity), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found no prior criminal history, no misuse of interim bail, and noted that witnesses were family members of the complainant with no independent witnesses presented. Each accused was ordered to furnish bail bonds of ₹50,000 with personal bonds and undertakings to appear in court, cooperate with proceedings, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case