Ma Annapurna Rice Mill Madhpura Through Properitor Sarvada Nishchint Dixit vs Mr. Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Kannauj — 12/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section na. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPKJ010003902026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ma Annapurna Rice Mill Madhpura Through Properitor Sarvada Nishchint Dixit
Adv. Vivek Kumar Dixit
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr. Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Kannauj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Application DisposalView PDF
The District Judge of Kannauj granted the petitioner's transfer application, ordering that Civil Suit No. 54/2010 (Annpurna Rice Mill vs. UP State Electricity Board) be transferred from the Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) to another Civil Judge court. The court found that while the petitioner's son had filed a complaint against the presiding officer in the Supreme Court, this created a reasonable apprehension of bias in the petitioner's mind, necessitating the transfer to maintain public confidence in the judicial process, despite the defendant's objection regarding pending electricity dues of ₹57,52,994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2026
The District Judge of Kannauj granted the petitioner's transfer application, ordering that Civil Suit No. 54/2010 (Annpurna Rice Mill vs. UP State Electricity Board) be transferred from the Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) to another Civil Judge court. The court found that while the petitioner's son had filed a complaint against the presiding officer in the Supreme Court, this created a reasonable apprehension of bias in the petitioner's mind, necessitating the transfer to maintain public confidence in the judicial process, despite the defendant's objection regarding pending electricity dues of ₹57,52,994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts