Deepak Kumar vs State — 190/2026

Case under Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1),(1)d. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010003682026

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

190/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

325

Police Station

TIRWA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1),(1)d
Indian Penal Code Section 354,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Kumar

    Adv. Aneeta Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Court in Kannauj granted bail to accused Deepak Kumar on March 9, 2026, in case No. 282/2022 under IPC sections 354, 506, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(1)(w)(i). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature and gravity of the charges, the lack of prior criminal history of the accused, and the absence of additional evidence to be collected. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC/St Act

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC/St Act

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 190/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Court in Kannauj granted bail to accused Deepak Kumar on March 9, 2026, in case No. 282/2022 under IPC sections 354, 506, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(1)(w)(i). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature and gravity of the charges, the lack of prior criminal history of the accused, and the absence of additional evidence to be collected. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case