State vs AKRAM WARSI — 5/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307,298,504,506,IPCAND7CLAACT. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
Session Trial
CNR: UPKJ010002242016
Filing Number
1418/2016
Filing Date
06-01-2016
Registration No
5/2016
Registration Date
06-01-2016
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
20-Adj F.T.C.II
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
448
Police Station
KOTWALI KANNAUJ
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Sant Kumar Dubey
Respondent(s)
AKRAM WARSI
Bablu
Hearing History
Judge: 20-Adj F.T.C.II
Disposed
For final arguments
For final arguments
For final arguments
For Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | For final arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | For final arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | For final arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | For Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Kannauj acquitted both accused Akram Warsi and Babloo (also known as Kaunain) of all charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 298, 504, 506 and Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 7, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a shooting incident occurred on July 5, 2015 causing injury to Amardeep Singh, the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies contradicted each other during cross-examination, particularly regarding the accused's involvement and the shooter's identity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Kannauj acquitted both accused Akram Warsi and Babloo (also known as Kaunain) of all charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 298, 504, 506 and Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 7, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a shooting incident occurred on July 5, 2015 causing injury to Amardeep Singh, the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies contradicted each other during cross-examination, particularly regarding the accused's involvement and the shooter's identity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts