State of U.P. vs DINA NATH and one — 579/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,3(1)d,dh,sc,st,act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Special Trial
CNR: UPJP010088912018
Filing Number
5624/2018
Filing Date
11-Dec-2018
Registration No
579/2018
Registration Date
13-Dec-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
MUGRA BADSHAHPUR
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Adv. dgc crl
Respondent(s)
-
1.DINA NATH and one
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Special Sessions Court acquitted Deenanath Shukla and Rohit Shukla of charges under IPC Sections 323/34, 504, and SC/ST Act provisions, finding the prosecution evidence insufficient to prove the alleged assault and abusive conduct beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the witnesses' contradictory statements—particularly the complainant's admission during cross-examination that the accused did not beat or abuse the victims—undermined the prosecution's case, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Feb-2026
Judgement
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
24-May-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
29-Oct-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
19-Jun-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
12-May-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
03-Apr-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Feb-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
14-Dec-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Aug-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
25-Jun-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
04-May-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Mar-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
14-Jan-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
23-Nov-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
27-Sep-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Jul-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Jun-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Apr-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Feb-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
21-Dec-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Nov-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Sep-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
14-Aug-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
30-Jun-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
19-May-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Apr-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
12-Mar-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
05-Feb-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
20-Jan-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
01-Jan-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
17-Dec-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Sep-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
29-Aug-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Jun-2019
Summon
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
23-Apr-2019
Summon
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Feb-2019
Summon
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
21-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 579/2018
Court Judgment Summary The Special Sessions Court acquitted Deenanath Shukla and Rohit Shukla of charges under IPC Sections 323/34, 504, and SC/ST Act provisions, finding the prosecution evidence insufficient to prove the alleged assault and abusive conduct beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the witnesses' contradictory statements—particularly the complainant's admission during cross-examination that the accused did not beat or abuse the victims—undermined the prosecution's case, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts