Arjun Gautam vs State of U.P. — 609/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),110,117(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010018212026

Filing Number

1524/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

609/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

MARIYAHUN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),110,117(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arjun Gautam

    Adv. Prahlad Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to Arjun Gautam in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 110, 117(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) related to an alleged assault. The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature of offense (maximum 7-year punishment), lack of criminal history, cooperation during investigation, and that the accused was already on interim bail. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the prosecution's objections, noting no criminal history was presented, no evidence of witness tampering, and the investigation was complete with the chargesheet filed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 609/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to Arjun Gautam in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 110, 117(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) related to an alleged assault. The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the nature of offense (maximum 7-year punishment), lack of criminal history, cooperation during investigation, and that the accused was already on interim bail. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the prosecution's objections, noting no criminal history was presented, no evidence of witness tampering, and the investigation was complete with the chargesheet filed. The court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case