Dhurvaraj Yadav vs State of U.P. — 608/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,353,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPJP010018202026
Filing Number
1523/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
608/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
310
Police Station
SIKRARA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhurvaraj Yadav
Adv. Mahendra Prasad Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Special Judge granted bail to Dhruraj Yadav in Bail Application No. 114 of 2026, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite serious charges under IPC Sections 332, 353, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court considered that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, the alleged offense carries a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions that the accused assist in investigation, not tamper with evidence/witnesses, and refrain from further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Judge granted bail to Dhruraj Yadav in Bail Application No. 114 of 2026, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite serious charges under IPC Sections 332, 353, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court considered that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, the alleged offense carries a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions that the accused assist in investigation, not tamper with evidence/witnesses, and refrain from further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts