Dhurvaraj Yadav vs State of U.P. — 608/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,353,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010018202026

Filing Number

1523/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

608/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

SIKRARA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 332,353,504,506
Prevention of Atrocities (S.c/s.t Act ) Section 3(2)(va)sc/stact

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhurvaraj Yadav

    Adv. Mahendra Prasad Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge granted bail to Dhruraj Yadav in Bail Application No. 114 of 2026, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite serious charges under IPC Sections 332, 353, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court considered that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, the alleged offense carries a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions that the accused assist in investigation, not tamper with evidence/witnesses, and refrain from further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 608/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge granted bail to Dhruraj Yadav in Bail Application No. 114 of 2026, finding sufficient grounds for release on bail despite serious charges under IPC Sections 332, 353, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court considered that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, the alleged offense carries a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions that the accused assist in investigation, not tamper with evidence/witnesses, and refrain from further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case