Suraj Alias Vishal Rajbhar 1 vs State of U.P. — 606/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010018182026

Filing Number

1521/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

606/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

148

Police Station

CHANDAWAK

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2)
Prevention of Atrocities (S.c/s.t Act ) Section 3(2)(Va)sc/stact

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Alias Vishal Rajbhar 1

    Adv. Vikas Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act cases at Jaunpur granted bail to applicants Suraj Rajbhar and Ashish Rajbhar, finding that despite allegations of assault, abusive language, and caste-based insults under BNS Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v), the applicants had no prior criminal history, cooperated during investigation, and the maximum punishment was less than 7 years. Each applicant was released on a bond of ₹25,000 with an equal surety, subject to conditions including cooperation in trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act cases at Jaunpur granted bail to applicants Suraj Rajbhar and Ashish Rajbhar, finding that despite allegations of assault, abusive language, and caste-based insults under BNS Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v), the applicants had no prior criminal history, cooperated during investigation, and the maximum punishment was less than 7 years. Each applicant was released on a bond of ₹25,000 with an equal surety, subject to conditions including cooperation in trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case