Lalchandra Gautam vs State of U.P. — 559/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010016212026

Filing Number

1339/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

559/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

MACHHALI SHAHAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.Lalchandra Gautam

Adv. Suresh Chandra Pandey

Respondent(s)

1.State of U.P.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Gangster Act), Jaunpur, rejected the bail petition of Lalchandra Gautam under the U.P. Gangster Act Section 3(1). The court found that Gautam is an accused member of an organized criminal gang led by Sachin Chauhan, allegedly involved in serious crimes including motorcycle theft, robbery, fraud, and fatal attacks on police, and determined there was no reasonable ground to believe him innocent or that he would not commit further offenses while on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
13-Mar-2026

Hearing

5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 559/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Gangster Act), Jaunpur, rejected the bail petition of Lalchandra Gautam under the U.P. Gangster Act Section 3(1). The court found that Gautam is an accused member of an organized criminal gang led by Sachin Chauhan, allegedly involved in serious crimes including motorcycle theft, robbery, fraud, and fatal attacks on police, and determined there was no reasonable ground to believe him innocent or that he would not commit further offenses while on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.