Shantanu Urf Punnu Upadhyay vs State of U.P. — 533/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010014972026

Filing Number

1233/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

533/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

SIKRARA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shantanu Urf Punnu Upadhyay

    Adv. Shyam Shanker Tripathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Shantanu Upadhyay in a case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(V). The court found that while the accused was alleged to have assaulted the complainant with others using casteist slurs, he had cooperated during investigation, had no criminal history, and the maximum punishment was only 7 years, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation in trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC ST Act.

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Shantanu Upadhyay in a case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(V). The court found that while the accused was alleged to have assaulted the complainant with others using casteist slurs, he had cooperated during investigation, had no criminal history, and the maximum punishment was only 7 years, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation in trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case