Faagu Lone Urf Ashish vs State of U.P. — 512/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,310(2),317(3),325,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPJP010014072026
Filing Number
1155/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
512/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
192
Police Station
PAWARA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Faagu Lone Urf Ashish
Adv. Upendra Vikram Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Special Gangster Act Judge), Jaunpur, granted bail to accused Fagu Lona (alias Ashish) in a cattle theft and attempted murder case (FIR No. 192/2024). The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime, noting the accused was not named in the FIR, lacked eyewitness identification, had no forensic corroboration, and was implicated solely through alleged police custody confessions. The court imposed bail of ₹1,00,000 with conditions requiring full cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 512/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge (Special Gangster Act Judge), Jaunpur, granted bail to accused Fagu Lona (alias Ashish) in a cattle theft and attempted murder case (FIR No. 192/2024). The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime, noting the accused was not named in the FIR, lacked eyewitness identification, had no forensic corroboration, and was implicated solely through alleged police custody confessions. The court imposed bail of ₹1,00,000 with conditions requiring full cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts