Ashish Chaubey and 1 vs State of U.P. — 449/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPJP010011402026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
908/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
449/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
ZAFRABAD
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashish Chaubey and 1
Adv. Vinay Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Disposed
Hearing
Restored
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Restored | |
| 27-02-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Jaunpur District Court (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) granted bail to Ashish Chaubey and Jayesh Chaubey in Bail Application No. 76/2026. The court found that while the accused faced charges under IPC Sections 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act Section 3(2) for allegedly assaulting a boy and using casteist slurs, the offences carry maximum 7 years imprisonment and bail grounds were sufficiently established. Each applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to regular court appearances and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jaunpur District Court (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) granted bail to Ashish Chaubey and Jayesh Chaubey in Bail Application No. 76/2026. The court found that while the accused faced charges under IPC Sections 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act Section 3(2) for allegedly assaulting a boy and using casteist slurs, the offences carry maximum 7 years imprisonment and bail grounds were sufficiently established. Each applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to regular court appearances and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts