Mohit Singh Urf Vivek Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. — 431/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJP010010862026

Filing Number

860/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

431/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

BADLAPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,BNSS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohit Singh Urf Vivek Kumar Singh

    Adv. Arvind Pratap Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mohit Singh (alias Vivek Kumar Singh) in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangsters Act, 1986. The court found the allegations serious, involving criminal conspiracy with gang members to commit grave offenses including rioting and murder using deadly weapons, and determined that the accused's anticipatory bail plea was not suitable for acceptance given the gravity and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th A.D.J. /Special Judge (Gangster Act)

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mohit Singh (alias Vivek Kumar Singh) in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangsters Act, 1986. The court found the allegations serious, involving criminal conspiracy with gang members to commit grave offenses including rioting and murder using deadly weapons, and determined that the accused's anticipatory bail plea was not suitable for acceptance given the gravity and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case