State of U.P. vs RAMLOCHAN CHAUHAN — 66/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,452,186,332,504,7,325,323,3(1)10. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
Special Trial
CNR: UPJP010005412017
Filing Number
406/2017
Filing Date
02-Feb-2017
Registration No
66/2017
Registration Date
02-Feb-2017
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
5
Police Station
BADLAPUR
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMLOCHAN CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary Sessions Case No. 11 of 2017, State vs Ramlochan The court acquitted the accused Ramlochan Chauhan of charges under IPC Sections 186, 323, 325, 332, 353, 452, 504 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(d) and 3(1)(e), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution eyewitnesses gave conflicting statements—the injured party's own testimony during cross-examination contradicted the prosecution narrative, and the other witnesses substantially retracted their allegations. The court concluded that the alleged assault did not occur as charged and the injury resulted from the witness accidentally slipping during a commotion at a school event. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
19-Mar-2026
Judgement
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Mar-2026
Statement U/S 313
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
01-May-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
23-Apr-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
01-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
27-Oct-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
22-May-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
03-Apr-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
20-Dec-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
02-Nov-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
07-Sep-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
22-Jul-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
16-Jun-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
18-May-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
05-Apr-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Mar-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
21-Feb-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Feb-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
07-Feb-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
28-Jan-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
13-Jan-2022
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
24-Dec-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
20-Dec-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
15-Dec-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
13-Dec-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
20-Nov-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
01-Nov-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Oct-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
11-Aug-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Jul-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
10-Jun-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
11-May-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
22-Mar-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Jan-2021
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
20-Nov-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Oct-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
26-Aug-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
09-Jul-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
30-May-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
18-Apr-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
29-Jan-2020
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
08-Nov-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
17-Aug-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
24-May-2019
Evidence
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
15-Feb-2019
Summon
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
01-Dec-2018
Summon
Spl. Judge SC ST Act.
-
06-Aug-2018
Summon
4th A.D.J. /Special Judge (E.c. Act)
-
15-May-2018
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
19-Feb-2018
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
19-Dec-2017
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
21-Sep-2017
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
26-Jul-2017
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
17-May-2017
Summon
A.D.J./ A.S.J. Court No.IV
-
10-Mar-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2017
Case Summary Sessions Case No. 11 of 2017, State vs Ramlochan The court acquitted the accused Ramlochan Chauhan of charges under IPC Sections 186, 323, 325, 332, 353, 452, 504 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(d) and 3(1)(e), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution eyewitnesses gave conflicting statements—the injured party's own testimony during cross-examination contradicted the prosecution narrative, and the other witnesses substantially retracted their allegations. The court concluded that the alleged assault did not occur as charged and the injury resulted from the witness accidentally slipping during a commotion at a school event. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts