shain Bano vs Abdul Hak Ansari and Others — 408/2018

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 210. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Complaint Cases

CNR: UPJL240008162018

Filing Number

408/2018

Filing Date

24-Nov-2018

Registration No

408/2018

Registration Date

24-Nov-2018

Court

Outlying court kalpi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 210

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.shain Bano

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Hak Ansari and Others

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  3. 09-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  4. 09-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  5. 23-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  6. 27-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  7. 04-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  8. 10-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  9. 09-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  10. 20-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  11. 08-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  12. 09-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  13. 21-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  14. 07-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  15. 28-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  16. 29-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  17. 15-Jun-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  18. 02-Apr-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  19. 14-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  20. 25-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  21. 15-Sep-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  22. 25-Jun-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  23. 03-Apr-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  24. 12-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  25. 20-Oct-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  26. 28-Aug-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  27. 11-Jun-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  28. 26-Mar-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  29. 11-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  30. 12-Feb-2019

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kalpی, Jalore district, ordered the accused (Abdul Haq Ansari, Abdul Hakeem Ansari, Kosher, and Pappu) to be charged under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner alleged that the accused demanded additional dowry (₹2 lakhs and a motorcycle) beyond the original dowry given at marriage, and subjected her to physical and verbal abuse when she could not comply. The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution and fixed the next hearing for March 15, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 12-Feb-2019

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi

  32. 04-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 24-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kalpی, Jalore district, ordered the accused (Abdul Haq Ansari, Abdul Hakeem Ansari, Kosher, and Pappu) to be charged under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner alleged that the accused demanded additional dowry (₹2 lakhs and a motorcycle) beyond the original dowry given at marriage, and subjected her to physical and verbal abuse when she could not comply. The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution and fixed the next hearing for March 15, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case