shain Bano vs Abdul Hak Ansari and Others — 408/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 210. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
Complaint Cases
CNR: UPJL240008162018
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
408/2018
Filing Date
24-11-2018
Registration No
408/2018
Registration Date
24-11-2018
Court
Outlying court kalpi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
shain Bano
Respondent(s)
Abdul Hak Ansari and Others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 09-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 09-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 23-06-2025 | Appearance |
| 27-03-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kalpی, Jalore district, ordered the accused (Abdul Haq Ansari, Abdul Hakeem Ansari, Kosher, and Pappu) to be charged under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner alleged that the accused demanded additional dowry (₹2 lakhs and a motorcycle) beyond the original dowry given at marriage, and subjected her to physical and verbal abuse when she could not comply. The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution and fixed the next hearing for March 15, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kalpی, Jalore district, ordered the accused (Abdul Haq Ansari, Abdul Hakeem Ansari, Kosher, and Pappu) to be charged under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner alleged that the accused demanded additional dowry (₹2 lakhs and a motorcycle) beyond the original dowry given at marriage, and subjected her to physical and verbal abuse when she could not comply. The court found sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution and fixed the next hearing for March 15, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts