bhuran khan vs shahdev urf lalla five other Advocate - sri K.D. shriwastava Ad. — 9/2012
Case under Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act Section OriginalSuit-16. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th May 2026 Date Not Updated.
Original Suit
CNR: UPJL240000662012
Filing Number
9/2012
Filing Date
19-Jan-2012
Registration No
9/2012
Registration Date
19-Jan-2012
Court
Outlying court kalpi
Judge
8-Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.bhuran khan
Adv. sri Saiyad iqbal husen ad.
Respondent(s)
-
1.shahdev urf lalla five other Advocate - sri K.D. shriwastava Ad.
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 7
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
20-Feb-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
25-Oct-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
16-Aug-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
13-Jul-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
07-Jul-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
13-Mar-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
13-Jan-2023
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
25-Nov-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
15-Oct-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
05-Sep-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
27-Jul-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
23-May-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
27-Apr-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
28-Mar-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
08-Mar-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
07-Feb-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
06-Jan-2022
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
01-Dec-2021
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
26-Oct-2021
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
23-Sep-2021
Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) C RNo. 8
-
01-Jul-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
09-Apr-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
15-Feb-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
19-Dec-2020
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
27-Oct-2020
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
26-Aug-2020
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
25-May-2020
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
25-Mar-2020
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
21-May-2019
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Summary The plaintiff's application (Order 38(2)) for amendment of petition was allowed on merits with a fee of Rs. 100. The court found that the plaintiff's earlier amendment application regarding court fee (dated 13-11-2016) had been previously accepted, and delays in amendment were justified due to the advocate being unavailable and the court remaining closed during specified periods. Plaintiff is directed to effect amendment without further delay, with witness evidence scheduled for 12-07-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2019
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
11-Oct-2018
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
25-Jul-2018
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
13-Sep-2016
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
13-Aug-2016
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
07-Jul-2016
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
19-Mar-2016
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
29-Jan-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2012
Summary The plaintiff's application (Order 38(2)) for amendment of petition was allowed on merits with a fee of Rs. 100. The court found that the plaintiff's earlier amendment application regarding court fee (dated 13-11-2016) had been previously accepted, and delays in amendment were justified due to the advocate being unavailable and the court remaining closed during specified periods. Plaintiff is directed to effect amendment without further delay, with witness evidence scheduled for 12-07-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts