chaman dixit vs nagar palika kalpi Advocate - sri Amar singh nishad ad. — 105/2004
Case under Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act Section OriginalSuit-16. Status: Objection/Disposal. Next hearing: 28th April 2026 Date Not Updated.
Original Suit
CNR: UPJL240000402004
Filing Number
105/2004
Filing Date
27-Sep-2004
Registration No
105/2004
Registration Date
27-Sep-2004
Court
Outlying court kalpi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.chaman dixit
Adv. sri m.ayub ad.
Respondent(s)
-
1.nagar palika kalpi Advocate - sri Amar singh nishad ad.
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
04-Feb-2026
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
07-Oct-2025
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
14-Jul-2025
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
27-Mar-2025
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
01-Jan-2025
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
10-Oct-2024
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
17-May-2024
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
28-Feb-2024
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
21-Sep-2023
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
22-Jul-2023
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
28-May-2023
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
02-May-2023
Objection/Disposal
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
28-Apr-2023
Restored
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
02-Nov-2018
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Summary The civil court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a declaration that he is the priest and manager of Bihari Ji Maharaj temple in Junaidpur, Indranagar, Jalaun, and that the disputed property (house numbers 12/13) belongs to the temple. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to file the suit as he was not the actual manager/priest, and that the case was barred under Section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act 1916 (restricting civil courts' jurisdiction over municipal tax assessment matters) and CPC Rule 11 Order 7. The plaintiff's claim was dismissed on grounds of lack of authority, jurisdiction, and procedural defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Nov-2018
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
29-Oct-2018
Judgement
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
24-Oct-2018
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
16-Oct-2018
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
08-Oct-2018
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
01-Oct-2018
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
29-May-2018
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
28-Mar-2018
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
28-Jul-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
20-Apr-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
19-Apr-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
19-Feb-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Kalpi
-
04-Jan-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2004
Case filed
Registration No. 105/2004
Summary The civil court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a declaration that he is the priest and manager of Bihari Ji Maharaj temple in Junaidpur, Indranagar, Jalaun, and that the disputed property (house numbers 12/13) belongs to the temple. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to file the suit as he was not the actual manager/priest, and that the case was barred under Section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act 1916 (restricting civil courts' jurisdiction over municipal tax assessment matters) and CPC Rule 11 Order 7. The plaintiff's claim was dismissed on grounds of lack of authority, jurisdiction, and procedural defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts