Shashibhushan Mishra vs State of UP and others — 98/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPJL010029972025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2100938/2025

Filing Date

28-05-2025

Registration No

98/2025

Registration Date

28-05-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC/ST Act

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

Police Station

KOTWALI ORAI

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Shashibhushan Mishra

Adv. Vikas Kumar

Respondent(s)

State of UP and others

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Spl. Judge SC/ST Act

11-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

Order/Disposal

17-02-2026

Hearing

05-02-2026

Hearing

29-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgement

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Jalaun dismissed the criminal revision filed by Shashi Bhushan Mishra, finding no legal error in the lower court's order that summoned him under IPC Sections 504-506 (criminal intimidation and abusive language). The court held that the lower court properly applied the "prima facie" test required at the summons stage and rejected the revisionist's arguments that the case was fabricated, noting the absence of supporting evidence for his claims while acknowledging the complainant's documentary evidence of pending dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Jalaun dismissed the criminal revision filed by Shashi Bhushan Mishra, finding no legal error in the lower court's order that summoned him under IPC Sections 504-506 (criminal intimidation and abusive language). The court held that the lower court properly applied the "prima facie" test required at the summons stage and rejected the revisionist's arguments that the case was fabricated, noting the absence of supporting evidence for his claims while acknowledging the complainant's documentary evidence of pending dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case