Shafeek Ahmad vs State of UP — 3000025/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 386,392,504. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJL010013732026

Filing Number

1339/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

3000025/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

5-Spl. Judge D.A.A

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KOTWALI ORAI

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 386,392,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shafeek Ahmad

    Adv. Mohd. Ahmad Riyaz

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Court Summary The Special Judge at Jalaun granted conditional bail to Shafik Ahmad Kadri in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 386, 504, and 392 (extortion, criminal intimidation, and dacoity). The court considered that the accused had been in jail since January 16, 2025, co-accused persons had already been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court, and the police investigation found no evidence of the alleged incident, while an earlier related case was withdrawn by mutual settlement. The bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge D.A.A

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Spl. Judge D.A.A

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge D.A.A

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3000025/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Special Judge at Jalaun granted conditional bail to Shafik Ahmad Kadri in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 386, 504, and 392 (extortion, criminal intimidation, and dacoity). The court considered that the accused had been in jail since January 16, 2025, co-accused persons had already been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court, and the police investigation found no evidence of the alleged incident, while an earlier related case was withdrawn by mutual settlement. The bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case