Pooja Devi vs Deepak and others — 3000041/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPJL010013102026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1277/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

3000041/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

5-Spl. Judge D.A.A

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

Police Station

KUTHAUND

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

Pooja Devi

Adv. Chandra Shekhar Dixit

Respondent(s)

Deepak and others

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Spl. Judge D.A.A

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgement

Summary: The Special Judge at Jalaun registered a petition filed by Puja Devi under Section 173(4) BNSS as a formal complaint/FIR. Puja Devi alleged that on 23.02.2026, six defendants entered her home armed with weapons and assaulted her, causing injuries and theft of her mangalsutra, threatening her life when she tried to seek help. The court found the petition contained sufficient factual allegations within the petitioner's personal knowledge and relied on Supreme Court precedent (Priyanka Srivastava v. U.P. State) to hold that it was registerable as a cognizable offense under IPC Sections 452, 504, 436, 506 (and related provisions). The matter was directed to be registered as a criminal case with the next hearing scheduled for 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge at Jalaun registered a petition filed by Puja Devi under Section 173(4) BNSS as a formal complaint/FIR. Puja Devi alleged that on 23.02.2026, six defendants entered her home armed with weapons and assaulted her, causing injuries and theft of her mangalsutra, threatening her life when she tried to seek help. The court found the petition contained sufficient factual allegations within the petitioner's personal knowledge and relied on Supreme Court precedent (Priyanka Srivastava v. U.P. State) to hold that it was registerable as a cognizable offense under IPC Sections 452, 504, 436, 506 (and related provisions). The matter was directed to be registered as a criminal case with the next hearing scheduled for 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case