Pooja Devi vs Deepak and others — 3000041/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPJL010013102026

Filing Number

1277/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

3000041/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

5-Spl. Judge D.A.A

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KUTHAUND

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pooja Devi

    Adv. Chandra Shekhar Dixit

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepak and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge at Jalaun registered a petition filed by Puja Devi under Section 173(4) BNSS as a formal complaint/FIR. Puja Devi alleged that on 23.02.2026, six defendants entered her home armed with weapons and assaulted her, causing injuries and theft of her mangalsutra, threatening her life when she tried to seek help. The court found the petition contained sufficient factual allegations within the petitioner's personal knowledge and relied on Supreme Court precedent (Priyanka Srivastava v. U.P. State) to hold that it was registerable as a cognizable offense under IPC Sections 452, 504, 436, 506 (and related provisions). The matter was directed to be registered as a criminal case with the next hearing scheduled for 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge D.A.A

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3000041/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge at Jalaun registered a petition filed by Puja Devi under Section 173(4) BNSS as a formal complaint/FIR. Puja Devi alleged that on 23.02.2026, six defendants entered her home armed with weapons and assaulted her, causing injuries and theft of her mangalsutra, threatening her life when she tried to seek help. The court found the petition contained sufficient factual allegations within the petitioner's personal knowledge and relied on Supreme Court precedent (Priyanka Srivastava v. U.P. State) to hold that it was registerable as a cognizable offense under IPC Sections 452, 504, 436, 506 (and related provisions). The matter was directed to be registered as a criminal case with the next hearing scheduled for 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case