Raghvendra Rajpoot alias Golu vs State of UP — 142/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 27. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPJL010012822026
Filing Number
1251/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
142/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
KOTWALI ORAI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raghvendra Rajpoot alias Golu
Adv. Rajesh Chaturvedi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Summary The court approved the bail application of accused Raghuvendu Rajput under the Arms Act. The accused was arrested for allegedly firing at police during an encounter on December 3, 2025, when two individuals on a motorcycle attempted to flee and fired at police, resulting in injuries. Since the main charge under Section 109 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act had already been granted bail on January 17, 2026, the court found it appropriate to grant bail in the subsequent Section 27 Arms Act charges. The accused was released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 142/2026
Summary The court approved the bail application of accused Raghuvendu Rajput under the Arms Act. The accused was arrested for allegedly firing at police during an encounter on December 3, 2025, when two individuals on a motorcycle attempted to flee and fired at police, resulting in injuries. Since the main charge under Section 109 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act had already been granted bail on January 17, 2026, the court found it appropriate to grant bail in the subsequent Section 27 Arms Act charges. The accused was released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts