Mohd. Dilshad vs State of UP — 2200010/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJL010012192026

Filing Number

1193/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

2200010/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

22-ADJ (Ftc) (Crime against Women)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0088

Police Station

KOTWALI ORAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd. Dilshad

    Adv. Brijraj Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of the accused under the Gangsters Act, 1986. The court found that the accused is involved in organized criminal activities with serious charges including extortion and intimidation, and that the statutory conditions under Section 19(4)(b) of the Gangsters Act were not satisfied to grant bail despite the accused's claims of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ (Ftc) (Crime against Women)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ (Ftc) (Crime against Women)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2200010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of the accused under the Gangsters Act, 1986. The court found that the accused is involved in organized criminal activities with serious charges including extortion and intimidation, and that the statutory conditions under Section 19(4)(b) of the Gangsters Act were not satisfied to grant bail despite the accused's claims of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case