Ramakant vs Arvind Kumar and 2 others — 3000034/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPJL010011682026
Filing Number
1141/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
3000034/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court
Judge
5-Spl. Judge D.A.A
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
Police Station
AIT
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramakant
Adv. Sri Hemant Dwivedi
Respondent(s)
Arvind Kumar and 2 others
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Spl. Judge D.A.A
Disposed
Order/Disposal
Order/Disposal
Order/Disposal
Order/Disposal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/Disposal |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/Disposal |
| 07-03-2026 | Order/Disposal |
| 06-03-2026 | Order/Disposal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Judge (D.A.A) at Jalaun registered a petition under Section 173(4) BNSS as a criminal case. Petitioner Ramakant alleged that the former owner of his residential plot, Arvind Kumar, fraudulently transferred the property to Lalluram Sharma on 12.08.2005 (after selling it to Ramakant on 17.02.2005), and that all three respondents subsequently assaulted him, looted his gold chain and ₹20,000 while preventing construction on his plot. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature concerning land ownership, noting that a civil suit was already pending and the police had declined to register a case. However, applying Supreme Court precedent, the court registered the petition as a criminal case and scheduled it for hearing on 03.04.2026 under Section 223 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special Judge (D.A.A) at Jalaun registered a petition under Section 173(4) BNSS as a criminal case. Petitioner Ramakant alleged that the former owner of his residential plot, Arvind Kumar, fraudulently transferred the property to Lalluram Sharma on 12.08.2005 (after selling it to Ramakant on 17.02.2005), and that all three respondents subsequently assaulted him, looted his gold chain and ₹20,000 while preventing construction on his plot. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature concerning land ownership, noting that a civil suit was already pending and the police had declined to register a case. However, applying Supreme Court precedent, the court registered the petition as a criminal case and scheduled it for hearing on 03.04.2026 under Section 223 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts