Nitendra Alias Mataprasad Rajpoot vs State of UP — 118/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,115(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJL010010532026

Filing Number

1030/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

695

Police Station

KOTWALI ORAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,115(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitendra Alias Mataprasad Rajpoot

    Adv. K.K. Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Jalaun District Court granted bail to Nitendra Urf Mata Prasad Rajput in Case No. 695/2025 under IPC sections 109, 352, and 115(2). The court found insufficient evidence that the applicant was present at the crime scene or directly participated in the firing incident; he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only based on co-accused statements. Bail was approved on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Jalaun District Court granted bail to Nitendra Urf Mata Prasad Rajput in Case No. 695/2025 under IPC sections 109, 352, and 115(2). The court found insufficient evidence that the applicant was present at the crime scene or directly participated in the firing incident; he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only based on co-accused statements. Bail was approved on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case