Shivam and 3 others vs State of UP — 200019/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPJL010006952026

Filing Number

658/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

200019/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court

Judge

2-Spl. Judge SC/ST Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

191

Police Station

ATA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(2)(5a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivam and 3 others

    Adv. Alok Dixit

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Jalaun granted bail to four accused persons (Shivam, Harendra Singh, Chintu, and Gajendra Singh) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and SC/ST Act violations, after finding insufficient grounds for continued detention and no prior criminal history. The court imposed bail conditions requiring each accused to furnish personal bonds of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and imposed restrictions against intimidating witnesses and ensuring court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Act

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Act

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200019/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Jalaun granted bail to four accused persons (Shivam, Harendra Singh, Chintu, and Gajendra Singh) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and SC/ST Act violations, after finding insufficient grounds for continued detention and no prior criminal history. The court imposed bail conditions requiring each accused to furnish personal bonds of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and imposed restrictions against intimidating witnesses and ensuring court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case