Omprakash Singh vs State Government — 310/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 13th April 2026.
CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: UPHR010074812025
Filing Number
7112/2025
Filing Date
01-Nov-2025
Registration No
310/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
PIHANI
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Omprakash Singh
Adv. PRADHEESH KUMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
-
2.Kusuma Devi
-
3.Anjali Devi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
-
2.Anjali Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Hardoi set aside the summoning order against revisionists Omprakash Singh, Kusuma Devi, and Anjali Devi for assault charges under IPC Section 323, finding that the trial court failed to properly analyze the evidence. The court noted that the single alleged assault incident from September 22, 2020 had already been reported to police and a case was pending in another court, invoking the principle that a person cannot be tried twice for the same offense. The case was remitted back to the trial court for a fresh order in light of these observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 310/2025
Summary The Sessions Judge, Hardoi set aside the summoning order against revisionists Omprakash Singh, Kusuma Devi, and Anjali Devi for assault charges under IPC Section 323, finding that the trial court failed to properly analyze the evidence. The court noted that the single alleged assault incident from September 22, 2020 had already been reported to police and a case was pending in another court, invoking the principle that a person cannot be tried twice for the same offense. The case was remitted back to the trial court for a fresh order in light of these observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts