Shivam Mishra vs Kalindri Mishra — 600/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.
CRIMINAL MISC. CASES - Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPHR010068132025
Filing Number
6477/2025
Filing Date
04-Oct-2025
Registration No
600/2025
Registration Date
08-Oct-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
MANJHILA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivam Mishra
Adv. RAM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kalindri Mishra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge rejected the applicant's transfer application under Section 448 B.N.S.S., holding that mere pendency of a criminal case against a relative of the opposite party cannot constitute sufficient grounds for transferring a maintenance proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court found that the applicant failed to specify the exact time of the alleged assault and made no allegations against the Presiding Officer, and noted that the case was already transferred to Gram Nyayalaya Shahabad for convenience of residents in remote areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 600/2025
The Sessions Judge rejected the applicant's transfer application under Section 448 B.N.S.S., holding that mere pendency of a criminal case against a relative of the opposite party cannot constitute sufficient grounds for transferring a maintenance proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court found that the applicant failed to specify the exact time of the alleged assault and made no allegations against the Presiding Officer, and noted that the case was already transferred to Gram Nyayalaya Shahabad for convenience of residents in remote areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts