Rambeti vs State Government — 210/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: UPHR010048402025
Filing Number
4609/2025
Filing Date
25-Jul-2025
Registration No
210/2025
Registration Date
31-Jul-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
BAGHAULI
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rambeti
Adv. SHYAM MILAN PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
-
2.Lakshman Prajapati
-
3.Anantram
-
4.Shobhit
-
5.Deepu
-
6.Omprakash
-
7.Vinod
-
8.Ashish
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The District and Sessions Court in Hardoi dismissed a criminal petition filed by Rambeti challenging the trial court's order dated 07.07.2025 in a land dispute case. The court found that the underlying dispute concerns civil/property matters (land ownership) rather than criminal offenses, and that the trial court properly rejected the petition under Section 156(3) CrPC. The court upheld the lower court's order, finding no legal irregularity or procedural error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. District And Sessions Judge -03
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 210/2025
Summary The District and Sessions Court in Hardoi dismissed a criminal petition filed by Rambeti challenging the trial court's order dated 07.07.2025 in a land dispute case. The court found that the underlying dispute concerns civil/property matters (land ownership) rather than criminal offenses, and that the trial court properly rejected the petition under Section 156(3) CrPC. The court upheld the lower court's order, finding no legal irregularity or procedural error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts