Suneeta Alias Rekha vs State Government — 671/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 333,115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPHR010015092026

Filing Number

1455/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

671/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC And ST Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

241

Police Station

MALLAWAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 333,115(2),352,351(3)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va)3(1)(ध)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suneeta Alias Rekha

  2. 2.Suraj Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Hardoi, directed accused Sunita alias Rekha and Suraj Kumar to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each without being taken into custody, following High Court directions in the Bacchi Devi case. Since the chargesheet was filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation, they were not remanded to judicial custody and bail applications were disposed of, while preserving the complainant-victim's right to be heard in future bail proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 671/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Hardoi, directed accused Sunita alias Rekha and Suraj Kumar to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each without being taken into custody, following High Court directions in the Bacchi Devi case. Since the chargesheet was filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation, they were not remanded to judicial custody and bail applications were disposed of, while preserving the complainant-victim's right to be heard in future bail proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case