Sujit vs State Government — 592/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPHR010013712026
Filing Number
1318/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
592/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
317
Police Station
ATRAULI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sujit
Adv. SHALINI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The Sessions Court, Hardoi granted bail to applicant Sujit in a theft case (FIR under BNS sections 305(a) and 331(4)) involving jewelry and cash worth approximately 10 lakhs stolen on 22.08.2025. The court accepted the bail petition after examining case records and found sufficient grounds, noting that while the applicant was not named in the original FIR, his involvement emerged during investigation and his co-accused's bail was previously granted. Sujit was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 592/2026
The Sessions Court, Hardoi granted bail to applicant Sujit in a theft case (FIR under BNS sections 305(a) and 331(4)) involving jewelry and cash worth approximately 10 lakhs stolen on 22.08.2025. The court accepted the bail petition after examining case records and found sufficient grounds, noting that while the applicant was not named in the original FIR, his involvement emerged during investigation and his co-accused's bail was previously granted. Sujit was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts