Netrapal vs State Government — 589/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPHR010013682026

Filing Number

1315/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

589/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

175

Police Station

LONAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Netrapal

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR MISHRA

  2. 2.Hariram

  3. 3.Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court at Hardoi granted conditional bail to three accused (Netrapal, Hariram, and Devi) in a theft case under BNS Sections 305(a), 331(4), and 317(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the facts, circumstances, and nature of the offense, despite the prosecution's opposition. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions including court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 589/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court at Hardoi granted conditional bail to three accused (Netrapal, Hariram, and Devi) in a theft case under BNS Sections 305(a), 331(4), and 317(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering the facts, circumstances, and nature of the offense, despite the prosecution's opposition. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions including court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case