Ram naresh Singh vs State Government — 587/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPHR010013632026

Filing Number

1310/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

587/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

557

Police Station

BILGRAM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram naresh Singh

    Adv. RAM DEO SHUKLA

  2. 2.Smt Meena singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Hardoi rejected the bail application of Ram Naresh Singh and Meena Singh, who are accused of dowry death under IPC Sections 85, 80(2) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of a serious offense—the death of the deceased bride (Komal) within one year of marriage under abnormal circumstances—which indicates a grave dowry-related homicide case punishable by life imprisonment, making bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 587/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Hardoi rejected the bail application of Ram Naresh Singh and Meena Singh, who are accused of dowry death under IPC Sections 85, 80(2) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of a serious offense—the death of the deceased bride (Komal) within one year of marriage under abnormal circumstances—which indicates a grave dowry-related homicide case punishable by life imprisonment, making bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case