Sarojani Devi vs Nadeem — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL MISC. CASES - Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPHR010003592026

Filing Number

343/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC And ST Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

QASIMPUR

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarojani Devi

    Adv. MOHD. UMAIR SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nadeem

  2. 2.Sayra Bano

  3. 3.Shafeek

  4. 4.Rajiya

  5. 5.Shahruk

  6. 6.Jakir

  7. 7.Sahil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS, finding that the case primarily stems from a matrimonial and personal dispute rather than warranting immediate investigation. The court noted significant delays in filing (over 2.5 months), the petitioner's earlier retraction of allegations before a magistrate, and the existence of a valid Special Marriage Act marriage between the parties, concluding that no prima facie case for investigation was established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC And ST Act

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS, finding that the case primarily stems from a matrimonial and personal dispute rather than warranting immediate investigation. The court noted significant delays in filing (over 2.5 months), the petitioner's earlier retraction of allegations before a magistrate, and the existence of a valid Special Marriage Act marriage between the parties, concluding that no prima facie case for investigation was established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case