KALLO ETC vs STATE OF U.P. — 330/2025
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 16. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPHM010037842025
Filing Number
3629/2025
Filing Date
20-Nov-2025
Registration No
330/2025
Registration Date
20-Nov-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
MAUDAHA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALLO ETC
Adv. PRASHANT KISHOR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)
-
25-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 330/2025
Summary The court directed the District Magistrate of Hamirpur to immediately release seized property to the petitioners in compliance with orders dated 30-09-2025 and 13-10-2025 under the Gangsters Act, 1986, after finding that the Magistrate had unlawfully withheld the property for over 45 days despite judicial directions. The court held that absent a stay order from the High Court, the District Magistrate has no authority to retain seized property and that non-compliance with court orders violates judicial procedure and the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts