KALLO ETC vs STATE OF U.P. — 330/2025

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 16. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPHM010037842025

Filing Number

3629/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

330/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MAUDAHA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALLO ETC

    Adv. PRASHANT KISHOR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Spl.Judge(D.A.A Act)

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 330/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court directed the District Magistrate of Hamirpur to immediately release seized property to the petitioners in compliance with orders dated 30-09-2025 and 13-10-2025 under the Gangsters Act, 1986, after finding that the Magistrate had unlawfully withheld the property for over 45 days despite judicial directions. The court held that absent a stay order from the High Court, the District Magistrate has no authority to retain seized property and that non-compliance with court orders violates judicial procedure and the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case