Dayanand Giri and others vs Manoj and others — 479/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 07th February 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPGZ010180252025
Filing Number
14508/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
479/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
07-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dayanand Giri and others
Adv. Tejveer Singh Maan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manoj and others
-
2.Sharma
-
3.Sanjeev Alias Pintu
-
4.Rajeev
-
5.Rajvati
-
6.Rahul
-
7.Sachin
-
8.vatan
-
9.Akash
-
10.Sandeep
-
11.Ranjeet singh
-
12.Mahesh
-
13.Dinesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2026
copy of orderView PDF
The District Judge of Ghaziabad granted the transfer petition to shift civil suit No. 739/2025 (concerning a disputed land property in Shahpur, Ghaziabad) from Civil Judge (J.D.) court to Civil Judge (Senior Division) court, despite finding the petitioner's claims largely unsubstantiated. The court transferred the case based on the presiding officer's opinion that transfer posed no objection, while noting that judicial procedures and court dignity should not be compromised by one-sided orders and unreasonable delays in justice delivery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Feb-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 479/2025
The District Judge of Ghaziabad granted the transfer petition to shift civil suit No. 739/2025 (concerning a disputed land property in Shahpur, Ghaziabad) from Civil Judge (J.D.) court to Civil Judge (Senior Division) court, despite finding the petitioner's claims largely unsubstantiated. The court transferred the case based on the presiding officer's opinion that transfer posed no objection, while noting that judicial procedures and court dignity should not be compromised by one-sided orders and unreasonable delays in justice delivery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts