State Government vs Ajay Chaudhary Others — 2702/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,307,504,506,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPGZ010162012023
Filing Number
16167/2023
Filing Date
16-Aug-2023
Registration No
2702/2023
Registration Date
16-Aug-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
78-ADJ/ Special Judge POCSO Court No 01
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
711
Police Station
MODI NAGAR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajay Chaudhary Others
-
2.Chaman Singh
-
3.Robin
-
4.Gaurav
-
5.Shubham
-
6.Sensarpal
-
7.Premveer Singh
-
8.Ankit @ Kalu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Ghaziabad acquitted all eight accused persons (Ajay Chaudhry, Gaurav, Shubham, Sensarpal, Premveer Singh, Akhit Urf Kalu, Chaman Singh, and Robin) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 307, 427, 504, and 506 in a case involving alleged rioting and assault at a shop on October 25, 2022. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting that all three prosecution witnesses contradicted the allegations during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ/ Special Judge POCSO Court No 01
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
ADJ/ Special Judge POCSO Court No 01
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
09-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
22-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
14-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
09-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
05-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
24-Dec-2025
Arguments
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
27-Aug-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No. 1
-
28-May-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No.13
-
10-Apr-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No.13
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No.13
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No.13
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
A.D.J. Court No.13
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
07-Sep-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
03-Jun-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
13-May-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
copy of orderView PDF
-
08-Nov-2023
copy of orderView PDF
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence
District & Session Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Appearance
District & Session Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Appearance
District & Session Judge
-
15-Sep-2023
Appearance
District & Session Judge
-
24-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2702/2023
Court Judgment Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Ghaziabad acquitted all eight accused persons (Ajay Chaudhry, Gaurav, Shubham, Sensarpal, Premveer Singh, Akhit Urf Kalu, Chaman Singh, and Robin) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 307, 427, 504, and 506 in a case involving alleged rioting and assault at a shop on October 25, 2022. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting that all three prosecution witnesses contradicted the allegations during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts