Chandraprakash and others vs Mahraj Khan and others — 63/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Revision

CNR: UPGZ010116212025

Filing Number

664/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

63/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandraprakash and others

    Adv. Chinmay Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahraj Khan and others

  2. 2.Mohm. Siraj

  3. 3.Salar Khan

  4. 4.Shama Parveen

  5. 5.Sarfaraj Khan

  6. 6.Aamir Khan

  7. 7.Kadar Khan

  8. 8.Sava

  9. 9.Sachin

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court upheld the lower court's order dismissing the petitioner's application seeking a fresh commissioner's inspection regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 139). The court found that the original commissioner's report dated 09.01.2024 was already examined and corroborated by evidence, and the petitioner failed to provide specific grounds for changes in the site conditions, making a second inspection unnecessary. The appeal was rejected and the lower court's decision of 15.05.2025 was affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court upheld the lower court's order dismissing the petitioner's application seeking a fresh commissioner's inspection regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 139). The court found that the original commissioner's report dated 09.01.2024 was already examined and corroborated by evidence, and the petitioner failed to provide specific grounds for changes in the site conditions, making a second inspection unnecessary. The appeal was rejected and the lower court's decision of 15.05.2025 was affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case