Mohit sharma vs U P Government — 31/2024

Case under U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 72(7). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: UPGZ010086582023

Filing Number

510/2023

Filing Date

17-Apr-2023

Registration No

31/2024

Registration Date

17-Apr-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 72(7)
Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohit sharma

    Adv. Jatin Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U P Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Judge of Ghaziabad dismissed the civil appeal of Mohit Sharma against his car's seizure under Section 72 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910. The court upheld the lower court's order confiscating the vehicle (Registration No. DL 11 CC 1966) after 24 cans of beer were recovered from it during a police checkpoint on July 3, 2022, while the appellant was transporting illegal liquor from Delhi to U.P. The court found no judicial error in the lower court's decision and held that the appellant had been given the option to recover the vehicle by depositing its assessed value in the Criminal Head. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  14. 28-May-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  15. 07-May-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  19. 31-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  20. 15-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  21. 14-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  22. 11-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  23. 07-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  24. 10-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  25. 12-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  26. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  27. 12-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  28. 17-May-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  29. 19-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  30. 15-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  31. 01-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  32. 29-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  33. 19-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  34. 20-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  35. 25-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  36. 27-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  37. 08-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  38. 09-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  39. 12-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  40. 30-May-2023

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  41. 12-May-2023

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  42. 05-May-2023

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  43. 28-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  44. 17-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 17-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Ghaziabad dismissed the civil appeal of Mohit Sharma against his car's seizure under Section 72 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910. The court upheld the lower court's order confiscating the vehicle (Registration No. DL 11 CC 1966) after 24 cans of beer were recovered from it during a police checkpoint on July 3, 2022, while the appellant was transporting illegal liquor from Delhi to U.P. The court found no judicial error in the lower court's decision and held that the appellant had been given the option to recover the vehicle by depositing its assessed value in the Criminal Head. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case