Vikas Singh Alias Munnu vs State Government — 1453/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105,352. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010032622026

Filing Number

3061/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1453/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-A.D.J. Court No. 1

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

Nandgram

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105,352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Singh Alias Munnu

    Adv. Jug mohan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of Vikas Singh in a case involving the death of Ritendra Yadav (FIR No. 83/2026, sections 105, 352 BNS). The court found sufficient evidence that Vikas Singh, along with a co-accused, assaulted the complainant's son, causing severe injuries that led to his death, and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the charges. The court rejected the defense arguments of innocence and lack of evidence, holding that the accused's involvement appeared prima facie established from the FIR and case diary records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1453/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of Vikas Singh in a case involving the death of Ritendra Yadav (FIR No. 83/2026, sections 105, 352 BNS). The court found sufficient evidence that Vikas Singh, along with a co-accused, assaulted the complainant's son, causing severe injuries that led to his death, and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the charges. The court rejected the defense arguments of innocence and lack of evidence, holding that the accused's involvement appeared prima facie established from the FIR and case diary records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case