Azmal and others vs State Government — 1447/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010032322026

Filing Number

3031/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1447/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-A.D.J. Court No. 4

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

461

Police Station

GHAZIABAD KOTWALI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Azmal and others

    Adv. Umardin.

  2. 2.Momina

  3. 3.Aman Alias Shahil Khan

  4. 4.Faiz Khan

  5. 5.Fardeen

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge in Ghaziabad granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Ajmal, Momena, Aman, Faiz Khan, and Fardin) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the FIR was registered based on false facts with a two-year delay, lacking independent evidence, and noted the parties had subsequently reconciled and lived amicably for two years, justifying bail on personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 4

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge in Ghaziabad granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Ajmal, Momena, Aman, Faiz Khan, and Fardin) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the FIR was registered based on false facts with a two-year delay, lacking independent evidence, and noted the parties had subsequently reconciled and lived amicably for two years, justifying bail on personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case