Khushilal vs State Government — 1373/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010031372026

Filing Number

2941/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1373/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-A.D.J. Court No. 3

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

Kaushambi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khushilal

    Adv. Subhash chandra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad granted bail to the accused Khushilal in a drugs case (NDPS Act Sections 8/20) filed at Kaushambi police station. The court found that while 1.72 kg of contraband was recovered, the accused had no prior criminal history, was the sole earner in his family, and the quantity warranted bail consideration during trial. The bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 3

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1373/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad granted bail to the accused Khushilal in a drugs case (NDPS Act Sections 8/20) filed at Kaushambi police station. The court found that while 1.72 kg of contraband was recovered, the accused had no prior criminal history, was the sole earner in his family, and the quantity warranted bail consideration during trial. The bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case