Farzan alias Nata and others vs State Government — 1329/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/21. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010030162026

Filing Number

2828/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1329/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-A.D.J. Court No. 3

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

73

Police Station

Shalimar Garden

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Farzan alias Nata and others

    Adv. Afzal Choudhary

  2. 2.Mohit

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, granted bail to the accused Farzan (alias Nata) and Mohit in a case under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act involving recovery of approximately 46 and 33 grams of heroin respectively. The court found that while the offense is serious, considering the small quantity of narcotics recovered, absence of prior criminal history, compliance issues with procedural safeguards, and facts of the case, bail was justified. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including appearance before court and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 3

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, granted bail to the accused Farzan (alias Nata) and Mohit in a case under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act involving recovery of approximately 46 and 33 grams of heroin respectively. The court found that while the offense is serious, considering the small quantity of narcotics recovered, absence of prior criminal history, compliance issues with procedural safeguards, and facts of the case, bail was justified. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including appearance before court and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case