Farzan alias Nata and others vs State Government — 1329/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/21. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPGZ010030162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2828/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
1329/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-A.D.J. Court No. 3
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
Shalimar Garden
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Farzan alias Nata and others
Adv. Afzal Choudhary
Mohit
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 4-A.D.J. Court No. 3
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, granted bail to the accused Farzan (alias Nata) and Mohit in a case under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act involving recovery of approximately 46 and 33 grams of heroin respectively. The court found that while the offense is serious, considering the small quantity of narcotics recovered, absence of prior criminal history, compliance issues with procedural safeguards, and facts of the case, bail was justified. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including appearance before court and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, granted bail to the accused Farzan (alias Nata) and Mohit in a case under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act involving recovery of approximately 46 and 33 grams of heroin respectively. The court found that while the offense is serious, considering the small quantity of narcotics recovered, absence of prior criminal history, compliance issues with procedural safeguards, and facts of the case, bail was justified. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹60,000 with two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions including appearance before court and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts