Golu Tiwari vs State Government — 1325/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010030152026

Filing Number

2827/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1325/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-A.D.J. Court No. 3

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Kaushambi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Golu Tiwari

    Adv. Himanshu kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad granted bail to accused Golu Tiwari in a NDPS Act case (Sections 8/20) under case no. 47/2026, finding that while 4 kg of contraband was recovered from him (below the 20 kg commercial quantity threshold), there was insufficient evidence of criminal history and his detention during investigation was unjustified. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including appearing before the court when required, not tampering with witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 3

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 3

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1325/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad granted bail to accused Golu Tiwari in a NDPS Act case (Sections 8/20) under case no. 47/2026, finding that while 4 kg of contraband was recovered from him (below the 20 kg commercial quantity threshold), there was insufficient evidence of criminal history and his detention during investigation was unjustified. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including appearing before the court when required, not tampering with witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case