Jagdish Kumar Pal and others vs State Government — 1251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),352,131,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010028512026

Filing Number

2675/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

1251/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-A.D.J. Court No. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

LINK ROAD

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),352,131,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagdish Kumar Pal and others

    Adv. Pradeep kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

  2. 2.Dev Kumar Pal

  3. 3.Mukul Pal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ghaziabad granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Jagdish Kumar Pal, Dev Kumar Pal, and Mukul Pal) on March 11, 2026, finding insufficient evidence despite allegations of assault with weapons and criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 131, and 352(2). The court noted weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including delayed FIR filing and absence of independent witnesses, while imposing standard bail conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Court No. 1

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Ghaziabad granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Jagdish Kumar Pal, Dev Kumar Pal, and Mukul Pal) on March 11, 2026, finding insufficient evidence despite allegations of assault with weapons and criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 131, and 352(2). The court noted weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including delayed FIR filing and absence of independent witnesses, while imposing standard bail conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case