Nimish Agarwal and others vs State Government — 979/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),331(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010024152026

Filing Number

2289/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

979/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

SAHIBABAD

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,317(2),331(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nimish Agarwal and others

    Adv. Afzal Choudhary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    bail orderView PDF

    The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad granted bail to accused Nimish Agrawal and Roshan Yadav in a theft case (Case No. 63/2026) under BNS sections 331(4), 305, 317(2), 3(5). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering that the FIR was registered against unknown persons, no independent witness confirmed the alleged recovery of stolen jewelry and cash, and a co-accused had already been granted bail, while noting the charges are triable by Magistrate Court. The accused were released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 979/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad granted bail to accused Nimish Agrawal and Roshan Yadav in a theft case (Case No. 63/2026) under BNS sections 331(4), 305, 317(2), 3(5). The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering that the FIR was registered against unknown persons, no independent witness confirmed the alleged recovery of stolen jewelry and cash, and a co-accused had already been granted bail, while noting the charges are triable by Magistrate Court. The accused were released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case