Vibhor Sharma vs State Government — 952/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPGZ010023672026
Filing Number
2241/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
952/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-A.D.J. Court No. 2
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
Loni Border
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vibhor Sharma
Adv. Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
bail orderView PDF
The Additional District and Sessions Court in Ghaziabad rejected the bail plea of Vibhor Sharma, who was accused of conspiring with co-accused persons to attempt to murder the wife of complainant Harishank by firing a gun on January 25, 2026. The court found the charge of attempted murder under IPC Sections 109(1), 61(2), and 3(5) to be grave in nature, involving premeditated conspiracy with a agreed monetary consideration, and determined that insufficient grounds existed to release the accused on bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
A.D.J. Court No. 2
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 952/2026
The Additional District and Sessions Court in Ghaziabad rejected the bail plea of Vibhor Sharma, who was accused of conspiring with co-accused persons to attempt to murder the wife of complainant Harishank by firing a gun on January 25, 2026. The court found the charge of attempted murder under IPC Sections 109(1), 61(2), and 3(5) to be grave in nature, involving premeditated conspiracy with a agreed monetary consideration, and determined that insufficient grounds existed to release the accused on bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts